CJ P. interviews Noam Chomski on the Obama Legacy.
I might call it the problematics of democracy.
But Not Fully Read Yet.
Early questions relate* to suggested Elizabeth Warren / Gary Johnson debate.
I will be looking for positive alternatives from this analysis, especially in foreign policy and diplomacy. The opposition must be accounted for, as well as the differences in neo-pragmatism.**
Something about working it here before working it over there? Or the inverse of the pre-Bush(43)con on policeman and nation builders.
*(The Warren Wing vis a vis the Libertarian Wing of the parties.)
** a fleeting label[!]
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query warren. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query warren. Sort by date Show all posts
Sunday, June 12, 2016
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
I need to go on a diet of humor.
But now that I men shun it.
Y U ...
[Hint] /?
But seriously,^ I was pondering a fantasy race today(3-25), and polled a few people. Who would be a suitable candidate to run with Rand Paul, for a fictional set up of a Warren/Reich ticket? Unfortunately one suggestion blew my punchline: Dennis Kucinich.*
Maybe I will fill in the inspiration^^ for this ponder/poll later. Not that there is anything wrong with Hillary. It is more of a take on the Hope and Change^ that has happened.
* that was not the intent of my poll;
but then who am I ^^to advise R's.
D' Ribble: "you people..."? / Who gets it?
Chimp ! Temporal / Monkey Business / C/D / (Eye of Be)Holder Courage / QCON: TruthOut (a, b, c/d, e, f)
^ 3-26-14 i.e. later
^^ who am I to advise: Throwing the Game / Apples and Oranges?
Y U ...
[Hint] /?
But seriously,^ I was pondering a fantasy race today(3-25), and polled a few people. Who would be a suitable candidate to run with Rand Paul, for a fictional set up of a Warren/Reich ticket? Unfortunately one suggestion blew my punchline: Dennis Kucinich.*
Maybe I will fill in the inspiration^^ for this ponder/poll later. Not that there is anything wrong with Hillary. It is more of a take on the Hope and Change^ that has happened.
* that was not the intent of my poll;
but then who am I ^^to advise R's.
D' Ribble: "you people..."? / Who gets it?
Chimp ! Temporal / Monkey Business / C/D / (Eye of Be)Holder Courage / QCON: TruthOut (a, b, c/d, e, f)
^ 3-26-14 i.e. later
^^ who am I to advise: Throwing the Game / Apples and Oranges?
Thursday, October 16, 2008
Debates Over?
Well it is 3 for 3 for Obama, unless you count the Warren Forum and the upcoming Al Smith dinner.
Domestic Policy:
McCain did not exactly attack using the same language that his campaign uses, and Obama did not exactly reply the way I suggested to the campaign. But McCain did come out on the losing end of the "tit-for-tat" as Obama simply had to repeat what was already out there and apparently missed by the McCain camp. My suggestion would have involved a reference to the media filters or reading material that McCain has access to in regards to his charge that Obama has not addressed the Ayers issue. Obama avoided getting dragged into the mud of the playground that McCain seemed to revel in. If you check all the bright eyed "gotcha" moments where McCain seemed to feel he was landing something, you might find that he overshot the runway. And it was generous that Obama did not more than smile at the childishness or point out McCain's confusion at some points.
New label: Debate.
Domestic Policy:
McCain did not exactly attack using the same language that his campaign uses, and Obama did not exactly reply the way I suggested to the campaign. But McCain did come out on the losing end of the "tit-for-tat" as Obama simply had to repeat what was already out there and apparently missed by the McCain camp. My suggestion would have involved a reference to the media filters or reading material that McCain has access to in regards to his charge that Obama has not addressed the Ayers issue. Obama avoided getting dragged into the mud of the playground that McCain seemed to revel in. If you check all the bright eyed "gotcha" moments where McCain seemed to feel he was landing something, you might find that he overshot the runway. And it was generous that Obama did not more than smile at the childishness or point out McCain's confusion at some points.
New label: Debate.
Wednesday, October 16, 2013
F'n P[!]
an-archy? / tan gent
[!] sarcasm irony punk.
Lede or Ship: Heading
4 M or links in order of insert
(In F able. / punc. / -archy / gent)
War'n Buffet Rule
The P ?
Original Intent: almost lost, Footnotes Page # ?
Gephardt* -House Republicans Changed the Rules to Keep Government Closed
McConnell -Who Controls the House GOP?
Battle. - George W. Bush and the Real Story of the Great Recession**** - (b.s.) Buffet + Warren
Re - Buffet +Metaphor
: - Rule + Field
congre$$ - [War'n Pic/MoveOn]
AM:
Pelosi/
Klobuchar
Gang **
** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell
*** Deep Files Go 4 it.
(buy Jim'n Knee: Faith 'n Progress ?)
[The Cycle? New Hostage on the Table. / Measured Optimism ? ]
[If you don't vote, you won't get your pudding. How can you get your pudding when you won't eat your meet?]
[!] sarcasm irony punk.
Lede or Ship: Heading
4 M or links in order of insert
(In F able. / punc. / -archy / gent)
War'n Buffet Rule
The P ?
Original Intent: almost lost, Footnotes Page # ?
Gephardt* -House Republicans Changed the Rules to Keep Government Closed
McConnell -Who Controls the House GOP?
Battle. - George W. Bush and the Real Story of the Great Recession**** - (b.s.) Buffet + Warren
Re - Buffet +Metaphor
: - Rule + Field
congre$$ - [War'n Pic/MoveOn]
AM:
Pelosi/
Klobuchar
Gang **
** links/line anachronistic
AM=Andrea Mithell
*** Deep Files Go 4 it.
(buy Jim'n Knee: Faith 'n Progress ?)
[The Cycle? New Hostage on the Table. / Measured Optimism ? ]
[If you don't vote, you won't get your pudding. How can you get your pudding when you won't eat your meet?]
Tuesday, December 30, 2014
Read or Ship?
Not fully sewn or C-sawed[!]
Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!] You got Ed!
Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?
Pardon the irony or mixed parody, which would you rather have, more Republican in the form of X, or Democracy in the form of Y? Still frackin’ about the Bane or poll-R-ization? AKA~
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .
Pre~emptive Rant:
The Obama Economy is not working[!] You got Ed!
Poll proposal:
Which would you rather have more Bane or change?
More of whatever Boehner is selling or more of what Warren in the form of Elizabeth and Buffet suggest?
Purple Badge of Rhetoric.
SUBtext or setting:
The Decartooning of Adam Smith or the full crumb of Keynesian/teeter recovery .
Tuesday, December 09, 2014
RYB
Red
Yellow
Blue?
Indi
go
vio
let
Orange
Green
U V
IR
change logos
Descartes before De Horse-Y ?
G-nos-T-IC!
see-C n'D @ indi go
12-15-14
We Lost the ‘CRomnibus’ Fight, But at Least Someone’s Fighting
What does Warren want?
Wall Street’s Revenge
How 'Awesome' Is America?
The Democratic Party Debates Its Soul "Very Instructive."
Yellow
Blue?
Indi
go
vio
let
Orange
Green
U V
IR
change logos
Descartes before De Horse-Y ?
G-nos-T-IC!
see-C n'D @ indi go
12-15-14
We Lost the ‘CRomnibus’ Fight, But at Least Someone’s Fighting
What does Warren want?
Wall Street’s Revenge
How 'Awesome' Is America?
The Democratic Party Debates Its Soul "Very Instructive."
Saturday, September 01, 2012
FOOTNOTES: SEPTEMBER 2012
SEE: SEGUE OF INTENIONS...(below)
9-28-12 [un(fn) since 9-21]
Butt bottoms up!
but: Yes-Butt Head in the Wrong Direction?
to: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/04/who-are-they-calling-elitist.html*
not: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/06/cap-and-trade.html
one: (b.s.) trickle + down
do: (b.s.) voodoo + economics
538: (scroll
compare: over)*
what Think Progress 96%
math (trouble with the curve)
d (w'rithmatic)
(*) satire + mockery
(b.s.): pun + (sic)
(**) total eclipse of the
*under construction
9-21-12 REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]
9-21-12 Ding, Ding, Ding (rough RE-draft)
[see Devo Mitt's BO*Son below]
9-21-12 Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding!
[Pulled from Circulation(Reverted to Draft) for Re-frame]
It is a hecuva job to footnote this. The Dings are about the fight and the perspectives.
4 Now I will just begin UC(under construction)
! Punderous Ponderings
? The Choice (4mat anomoly? )
C not but Al Gore Rhythms (retro ^)
[talk about (fn) nightmare of GPS]
[retro ^ = anachronism/time wrap/warp?]
etc Theology
Re Trinity
Material Off-Cuff
edited Charlotte 2012! [^ C ?]
track (label charts[PAGES])
to (blog search E.B.)
The Hope
darn knit(C ? Rythms ^)
Why OWS is Bigger than Left Vs. Right!
Only Economists Need Apply
hard (b.s Charlotte's Web)
---
risked (INET)
un (obtusity)
prophetic (dimentionalism)
---
Oh Obama Revives Social Security Idea: Raise Payroll Tax Cap To Replenish Fund
Point Professor Warren's Lesson
3 (prophetic/refrain) (NOT)
Ding: A return to economic sanity.
--\-- 4UC (line #3)
[devo]: Mitt's BO*Son (i.e. flip-flop of
--/--
A A return to economic sanity ?[*]
B Self Bernanke Myth (Fed Speak)
C Deflation Jon Stewart (Satire nor Economics)
D (60 Minutes) context
Lede^^: Tacky, tact, tack
Crack: Economy or Economics
"I don't want to be subjective...(but)^^^
^^ 47% Myth
^^^ Fight of the Century (Good Wrap: Bad Econ)
[*] This footnote segues between Ding and A. leaving out the middle and emblematic of Mitt and his flip-flop of economics.(@A) It is Keynesian not Supply or Demand. The Fight of the Century(@but) is a mockery of a satire on economics and the Deflation of Bernanke by Jon Stewart(@C) is a satire of a mockery of economics. .
9-19-12 Re:Focus
TIME Romney Refocuses as Obama Decries ‘Victim’ Claim
NFRY=(not fully read yet)
Is Klein on anyones side?[!]
[!]= ;-) If you don't know, scroll(and go click)yourself!
Hint: Goat Mountain ?
9-18-12 ...promote the general...
9-18-12
MB: No Apologies Tour? [UNDER (DE?)CONSTRUCTION]
Correction Leding Entitlement Group?
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49065421 Ryan
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076540
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076662 full leder
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076662
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076663 the cycle
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076582
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49073645 the place
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49074910 Andrea http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49074064 NOW
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/middle-east-&-n.-africa/49075550/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/south-&-central-asia/49075904/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/decision-2012/49075790/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49077139/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49076662/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065518/#49065518
Hardball and math death.
Bottom line update top lines and MB.
and who home runs?
9-18-12 Trouble with the Curve?
...promote the general...
9-17-12 One Heckuva Day. The Dickens...(peace meal [!])
Obama the Uniter!
9-14-12 Politics is local?
sausage: Ground
Romney/Ryan/Rand: Game
beef : ? *
footnotes: Not
out foxed the
Seattle PI usual
global text MO.**
** "well"
not: Rhetorical Been Laden In-Chief?!
exactly: Fed/Bernanke/Seattle PI
9-13-12 Rhetorical Been Laden[*] In-Chief [asterisk added (9-14) for English emphasis]
This [fn] under-construction and challenging. [comment embedded here (see English emphasis) as well]
SEGUE OF INTENTIONS GOING FORWARD:
FOOTNOTES (see label) BY MONTH. (under construction)
SCROLLING DOWN DATE OF INSERT WILL NOT BE INCLUDED UNLESS THERE IS AN UPDATE TO NOTE.
9-13-12 Links [update change]
Having instituted new footnote process here.[*]dupe applicable
9-13-12 Refrain post frain?[*]
satire: Mitt + BO*son
mockery: Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!
later: frain
4 huff posts
Dangerous Narratives
Whose Maker
Obama Role
The Bounce?
NFRY
* BaneOr
Out Foxed?
Rubric's Peek
"Feel the Love"?
Not to Follow-Up...
String Cheese Theory?
First Downgrade in US History!
Ideology
anachronism foray
Un-State of the Union
Conservative Foray (4A)
intended CAD
CAD (2 out of 3 be bad)
CAD (Culturally Aided Design)
CAD (To be or not 3d)
State of Politics
[Edits occurring post footnote @ some*** are not included in this footnote process as hinted at: *** exception to the rule(bottom line) [Footnotes** Change] appropriately
i.e. yet to footnote but what the google[anachronism unintended] or is it? ]
*** also not included here
[*]asterisks will appear bracketed by date, but unbracketed are from original post: * anachronism intended will appear in bold, followed by the contents of the b.s. [**]
[**] the exception to the rule [***]
[***] i.e. what the google you scroll over or click for link
ALSO post asterisk *** bracketeds not included here.
9-12-12 Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!
Footnoes under construction...
September 11th
heading*[^^]
[latest]
9-11-12 Forward?
the only link to outside source: (9-12) Politics
9-7-12 Other Mysterious Ways...
Heavy (GWB) on Huffington Post and b.s. (vous due[sic])
[selected links are footnoted]
There (HP) Climate Change not a Hoax
is (HP) Artists Against Fracking (Ono/Lennon)
W*(b.s.) Google Works
rithmatic (TLR)Four More Years
and (ibid) Mitts BO*son
After Math. (HP) BP/Isaac .
Un-bolded Under-construction, peace meal [!].
9-7-12 Google Works...
9-5-12 Four More Years!
9-4-12 Charlotte 2012!
Out Foxed?
9-2-12 For Pete Sake!
9-28-12 [un(fn) since 9-21]
Butt bottoms up!
but: Yes-Butt Head in the Wrong Direction?
to: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2008/04/who-are-they-calling-elitist.html*
not: http://political_progress_for_people.blogspot.com/2009/06/cap-and-trade.html
one: (b.s.) trickle + down
do: (b.s.) voodoo + economics
538: (scroll
compare: over)*
what Think Progress 96%
math (trouble with the curve)
d (w'rithmatic)
(*) satire + mockery
(b.s.): pun + (sic)
(**) total eclipse of the
*under construction
9-21-12 REFRAIN is a Heckuva Paradocs[!]
9-21-12 Ding, Ding, Ding (rough RE-draft)
[see Devo Mitt's BO*Son below]
9-21-12 Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding, Ding!
[Pulled from Circulation(Reverted to Draft) for Re-frame]
It is a hecuva job to footnote this. The Dings are about the fight and the perspectives.
4 Now I will just begin UC(under construction)
! Punderous Ponderings
? The Choice (4mat anomoly? )
C not but Al Gore Rhythms (retro ^)
[talk about (fn) nightmare of GPS]
[retro ^ = anachronism/time wrap/warp?]
etc Theology
Re Trinity
Material Off-Cuff
edited Charlotte 2012! [^ C ?]
track (label charts[PAGES])
to (blog search E.B.)
The Hope
darn knit(C ? Rythms ^)
Why OWS is Bigger than Left Vs. Right!
Only Economists Need Apply
hard (b.s Charlotte's Web)
---
risked (INET)
un (obtusity)
prophetic (dimentionalism)
---
Oh Obama Revives Social Security Idea: Raise Payroll Tax Cap To Replenish Fund
Point Professor Warren's Lesson
3 (prophetic/refrain) (NOT)
Ding: A return to economic sanity.
--\-- 4UC (line #3)
[devo]: Mitt's BO*Son (i.e. flip-flop of
--/--
A A return to economic sanity ?[*]
B Self Bernanke Myth (Fed Speak)
C Deflation Jon Stewart (Satire nor Economics)
D (60 Minutes) context
Lede^^: Tacky, tact, tack
Crack: Economy or Economics
"I don't want to be subjective...(but)^^^
^^ 47% Myth
^^^ Fight of the Century (Good Wrap: Bad Econ)
[*] This footnote segues between Ding and A. leaving out the middle and emblematic of Mitt and his flip-flop of economics.(@A) It is Keynesian not Supply or Demand. The Fight of the Century(@but) is a mockery of a satire on economics and the Deflation of Bernanke by Jon Stewart(@C) is a satire of a mockery of economics. .
9-19-12 Re:Focus
TIME Romney Refocuses as Obama Decries ‘Victim’ Claim
NFRY=(not fully read yet)
Is Klein on anyones side?[!]
[!]= ;-) If you don't know, scroll(and go click)yourself!
Hint: Goat Mountain ?
9-18-12 ...promote the general...
9-18-12
MB: No Apologies Tour? [UNDER (DE?)CONSTRUCTION]
Correction Leding Entitlement Group?
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49065421 Ryan
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076540
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076662 full leder
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076662
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076663 the cycle
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49076582
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49073645 the place
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49074910 Andrea http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065421/#49074064 NOW
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/middle-east-&-n.-africa/49075550/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/south-&-central-asia/49075904/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/decision-2012/49075790/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49077139/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/the-cycle/49076662/
http://video.msnbc.msn.com/martin-bashir/49065518/#49065518
Hardball and math death.
Bottom line update top lines and MB.
and who home runs?
9-18-12 Trouble with the Curve?
...promote the general...
9-17-12 One Heckuva Day. The Dickens...(peace meal [!])
Obama the Uniter!
9-14-12 Politics is local?
sausage: Ground
Romney/Ryan/Rand: Game
beef : ? *
footnotes: Not
out foxed the
Seattle PI usual
global text MO.**
** "well"
not: Rhetorical Been Laden In-Chief?!
exactly: Fed/Bernanke/Seattle PI
9-13-12 Rhetorical Been Laden[*] In-Chief [asterisk added (9-14) for English emphasis]
This [fn] under-construction and challenging. [comment embedded here (see English emphasis) as well]
SEGUE OF INTENTIONS GOING FORWARD:
FOOTNOTES (see label) BY MONTH. (under construction)
SCROLLING DOWN DATE OF INSERT WILL NOT BE INCLUDED UNLESS THERE IS AN UPDATE TO NOTE.
9-13-12 Links [update change]
Having instituted new footnote process here.[*]dupe applicable
9-13-12 Refrain post frain?[*]
satire: Mitt + BO*son
mockery: Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!
later: frain
4 huff posts
Dangerous Narratives
Whose Maker
Obama Role
The Bounce?
NFRY
* BaneOr
Out Foxed?
Rubric's Peek
"Feel the Love"?
Not to Follow-Up...
String Cheese Theory?
First Downgrade in US History!
Ideology
anachronism foray
Un-State of the Union
Conservative Foray (4A)
intended CAD
CAD (2 out of 3 be bad)
CAD (Culturally Aided Design)
CAD (To be or not 3d)
State of Politics
[Edits occurring post footnote @ some*** are not included in this footnote process as hinted at: *** exception to the rule(bottom line) [Footnotes** Change] appropriately
i.e. yet to footnote but what the google[anachronism unintended] or is it? ]
*** also not included here
[*]asterisks will appear bracketed by date, but unbracketed are from original post: * anachronism intended will appear in bold, followed by the contents of the b.s. [**]
[**] the exception to the rule [***]
[***] i.e. what the google you scroll over or click for link
ALSO post asterisk *** bracketeds not included here.
9-12-12 Fall-Awful on Mitt's Face!
Footnoes under construction...
September 11th
heading*[^^]
[latest]
9-11-12 Forward?
the only link to outside source: (9-12) Politics
9-7-12 Other Mysterious Ways...
Heavy (GWB) on Huffington Post and b.s. (vous due[sic])
[selected links are footnoted]
There (HP) Climate Change not a Hoax
is (HP) Artists Against Fracking (Ono/Lennon)
W*(b.s.) Google Works
rithmatic (TLR)Four More Years
and (ibid) Mitts BO*son
After Math. (HP) BP/Isaac .
Un-bolded Under-construction, peace meal [!].
9-7-12 Google Works...
9-5-12 Four More Years!
9-4-12 Charlotte 2012!
Out Foxed?
9-2-12 For Pete Sake!
Thursday, February 20, 2014
Tuesday, December 06, 2011
No Teddy[!]
BULL!
* LANDMARK SPEECH!
* Martin Bashir
unrelated?
No pun.
FIXED NEWS... meaning not here yet.
But this** is what I have been talking about.
** to be up dated (oops) HERE!
[BULLY PULPIT!!!!]
[Follow-up: Ratigan, Matthews, Sharpton]
The president talks the talk, congress must walk the walk. Propose/Dispose
MC Hammer: Middle Class Schtick is the Leverage.
Channeling Warren and Pokemon
(Boot straps anyone?).
[I rest my case. Bridge anyone?]
[Ed Schultz,(Defining moment) Rachel Maddow]
* LANDMARK SPEECH!
* Martin Bashir
unrelated?
No pun.
FIXED NEWS... meaning not here yet.
But this** is what I have been talking about.
** to be up dated (oops) HERE!
[BULLY PULPIT!!!!]
[Follow-up: Ratigan, Matthews, Sharpton]
The president talks the talk, congress must walk the walk. Propose/Dispose
MC Hammer: Middle Class Schtick is the Leverage.
Channeling Warren and Pokemon
(Boot straps anyone?).
[I rest my case. Bridge anyone?]
[Ed Schultz,(Defining moment) Rachel Maddow]
Tuesday, November 01, 2011
Hyper Sorting
The "Liberal Media" is Laughable...
Update
If Only It were Black and White
Axis of Fruit Loops
These links reflect the actual sequence of the last four posts.
The "Liberal Media" is Laughable...
Meet the Press from the week before featured Ron Paul(14 minutes in),
"undoubtably" the scariest thing for Herman Cain.
Then I feature Norman Goldman* "on the other hand"
Followed by two takes on the OWS crowd.
Update
Rovian Republican Recalcitrance(theory)
Attack Strength
SIN
and Spin on the Simpson-Bowles*** and the NRA**.
Axis of Fruit Loops
Martin Bashir on Koch/Cain and Mika Brzezinski on Elizabeth Warren on Morning Joe
* adding 10-31-11
** need Martin Bashir
*** Morning Joe?
[MB- McDermott on debt plans and super committee
Smoked Cheese, etc.]
Hi tech whining. [10-4-11 Republicans Crack Me Up]
Update
If Only It were Black and White
Axis of Fruit Loops
These links reflect the actual sequence of the last four posts.
The "Liberal Media" is Laughable...
Meet the Press from the week before featured Ron Paul(14 minutes in),
"undoubtably" the scariest thing for Herman Cain.
Then I feature Norman Goldman* "on the other hand"
Followed by two takes on the OWS crowd.
Update
Rovian Republican Recalcitrance(theory)
Attack Strength
SIN
and Spin on the Simpson-Bowles*** and the NRA**.
Axis of Fruit Loops
Martin Bashir on Koch/Cain and Mika Brzezinski on Elizabeth Warren on Morning Joe
* adding 10-31-11
** need Martin Bashir
*** Morning Joe?
[MB- McDermott on debt plans and super committee
Smoked Cheese, etc.]
Hi tech whining. [10-4-11 Republicans Crack Me Up]
Thursday, April 12, 2012
WOE / Wae
War on Executives:
I am not saying that the Republicans are waging a war on women or that Democrats are not saying it. I am saying there are two questions which I will not answer, who started the war and who started calling it a war? I am also saying that I have not found the evidence in the links attached here, and suggesting that there is a war no matter who calls it a war or who started calling it a war.
I have yet to find who started the claim that there is a war on women. I am not saying that I don't believe that Obama could have used the term*, I just haven't found it.**
I have yet to find who started the claim that there is a war on women. I am not saying that I don't believe that Obama could have used the term*, I just haven't found it.**
* war on women, war against women, war for women...'s votes.
[Google of the Day? Is it an anomaly that Steve Benen on Rachel Maddow Blog is the second hit for the question. "When did..." re-framed as "Has President Obama said there is a war on women?" Third Frame: "Obama talks about war on women." Fourth fishing trip? No War on Women. WOW! ]
[Jumping in the Lakoff! But Republicans cannot win the VFW.(Victory for Women or Victory from Whining.) It is a victory for wordplay.]
** added 4-13-12 (** that is) Haven't found the President using the term but Debbie Wasserman-Schultz is quoted using it without full context in the CSM.
Monday, July 11, 2011
N-oddly Enough...
[7-17-11 updating in progress]
I intend to expound upon the derivative-lined analogy(see Hint there).
To begin with, I had expounded upon the Murdoch troubles and 'N NPR report on my way into the NWRoots Conference. The NPR report had noted that Murdoch had influence, but it was not necessarily what made the difference in** elections in the light of his selecting a winner, not making a winner, and that it was more about money(power) than ideology(which needs more light or shading). Warren Buffet reflects some of this area that I 4shadow or shame. And Maher's remarks almost bring to color the ironic balance of logic.
Hint: 'N = not (also "an"*)
Math: 'N X N = 4 = GPS [!]= ...
Or is it Not^3=Oh[!]
* & is '4 a sine or cosine?
[footnote: Segue /'N Horsey 'Nadir]
[7-17-11 'Nconsistency ofor whichcraft[sp!].]
** correction "in" added 12-16-11 found in Pun on Tangent/Sine/Cosine
I intend to expound upon the derivative-lined analogy(see Hint there).
To begin with, I had expounded upon the Murdoch troubles and 'N NPR report on my way into the NWRoots Conference. The NPR report had noted that Murdoch had influence, but it was not necessarily what made the difference in** elections in the light of his selecting a winner, not making a winner, and that it was more about money(power) than ideology(which needs more light or shading). Warren Buffet reflects some of this area that I 4shadow or shame. And Maher's remarks almost bring to color the ironic balance of logic.
Hint: 'N = not (also "an"*)
Math: 'N X N = 4 = GPS [!]= ...
Or is it Not^3=Oh[!]
* & is '4 a sine or cosine?
[footnote: Segue /'N Horsey 'Nadir]
[7-17-11 'Nconsistency ofor whichcraft[sp!].]
** correction "in" added 12-16-11 found in Pun on Tangent/Sine/Cosine
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
S-word of Damocles
The Last Word?*
Jared Bernstein: The Sequester.
Un-Meta Glom ?
The Warren Wing?
Justice Leon
Re: Right Mindwringing?
Not.
[*The Sequester has been partially alleviated...
Italics & Note and links to The Last Word inserted 12-18-13]
Note: There must be a genre for analogue evolution [!] Might be under the rubric of Hegelian objectivism[!] Or Manichean Subjectivism ? The Vote is the Sword. The Sequester is the S-Word.
Re: HA?[!]
[x, y, z ? (ow)]
Jared Bernstein: The Sequester.
Un-Meta Glom ?
The Warren Wing?
Justice Leon
Re: Right Mindwringing?
Not.
[*The Sequester has been partially alleviated...
Italics & Note and links to The Last Word inserted 12-18-13]
Note: There must be a genre for analogue evolution [!] Might be under the rubric of Hegelian objectivism[!] Or Manichean Subjectivism ? The Vote is the Sword. The Sequester is the S-Word.
Re: HA?[!]
[x, y, z ? (ow)]
Monday, April 19, 2010
Left Behind
Legacy?
Warren or Koh for Supreme Court?
"This Will Be Obama's Legacy."
Mine will be to better read*. But I did entertain thoughts that the seemingly disenfranchised left merge with the Tea Partiers to come together on the populist issues that might make for progress ala Ross Perot or Ron Paul. Not that I would fall for such a pipe dream or policital calculus of hope.
* or weave?(comment there)Manicean TriUnism? Two Reeds?
[Yet! On the other hand!]
Warren or Koh for Supreme Court?
"This Will Be Obama's Legacy."
Mine will be to better read*. But I did entertain thoughts that the seemingly disenfranchised left merge with the Tea Partiers to come together on the populist issues that might make for progress ala Ross Perot or Ron Paul. Not that I would fall for such a pipe dream or policital calculus of hope.
* or weave?(comment there)Manicean TriUnism? Two Reeds?
[Yet! On the other hand!]
Tuesday, September 01, 2009
comments
place holder
(review links and labels for hiatus... post)
August 2009
September:
[9-3-09: Krugman on Obama and progress in perspective ]*
[Dancing Wu Li Masters]
UPDATES
[9-3-09: Randi Rhodes.]
*place holder 9-3-09 Warren Committee
and Dancing...
(review links and labels for hiatus... post)
August 2009
September:
[9-3-09: Krugman on Obama and progress in perspective ]*
[Dancing Wu Li Masters]
UPDATES
[9-3-09: Randi Rhodes.]
*place holder 9-3-09 Warren Committee
and Dancing...
Wednesday, September 05, 2012
Four More Years!
[ Wednesday 9-5-12 Original Post 1:27 PM]
* C-charts
** Harry Reid
*** Bill Clinton (or the three R's)
[RawMoney, Lyin', Writhmatic.]
[Republican concedes.]^^
Note: Update anomoly or algorythm?
(Jansing&Co and The Place for Politics^)
(Not finished with links)
(Original labels: cartoons, charts, DNC Convention, Obamanomics)
^ Fluke Flays Romney
^^ Bill o'check? (inconvenient aster^^^risked)
^^^ You know you are a Tea Partier if...you expect a berg'R King,
Tuesday, October 25, 2011
The Big Cheese
And a block* at that.
With a little corn, Mother Jones columnist currently has the grater. But Mark Block is a bit smoked...out. (with David on Martin Bashir)
Where's the cheese? Well, Rove between the Perry Yeah and the Koch/Cain, not that I con done it. But we could have a spread at the Jimmy/Warren buffet or tale gate, with devils food cake. Not that I am branding but there are three flavors of GepPetTo.
[Segue ? cutcapandbalance? Track record of half-time.]
*the pickle or special sauce is Martin Bashir(Bubba Gump anyone?)
[all italic links inserted late evening]
[Not to mention the cheese link, week old cheese.]
[Not to mention Jobs OWS]
[And one more thumbs up for O'Donnell. It is called bread and circuses and Trump is the latter. Keep on advising those GOP.]
With a little corn, Mother Jones columnist currently has the grater. But Mark Block is a bit smoked...out. (with David on Martin Bashir)
Where's the cheese? Well, Rove between the Perry Yeah and the Koch/Cain, not that I con done it. But we could have a spread at the Jimmy/Warren buffet or tale gate, with devils food cake. Not that I am branding but there are three flavors of GepPetTo.
[Segue ? cutcapandbalance? Track record of half-time.]
*the pickle or special sauce is Martin Bashir(Bubba Gump anyone?)
[all italic links inserted late evening]
[Not to mention the cheese link, week old cheese.]
[Not to mention Jobs OWS]
[And one more thumbs up for O'Donnell. It is called bread and circuses and Trump is the latter. Keep on advising those GOP.]
Thursday, March 05, 2009
Irony versus Hypocrisy
Smackdown: Shuster Nails Ari Fleischer over GOP Hypocrisy
Shuster gives as good as he takes, but the irony is that Fleischer is there arguing over the childishness of Obama when Rush is not elected by the people, and neither is he. So the Catch 44 is that if Obama is wrong for painting the Republicans with a Rush Brush, then MSNBC is wrong for presenting unelected spokespeople for the Republicans, however it is the nature of the media to try to present both sides, and the nature of the Republicans to use Joe the Plumbers.
Speaking of plumbers and whose job it is...
Several links having filtered through my email box unprofessionally*
bridge the spectrum and filling the bill.
I will not unembed the threads but leap to the next field so to speak.
A more selective approach browsing the TED forum, a spin on the technology of politics and religion by Noah Feldman presents a preemptive perspective on hope. Having viewed less than two minutes, I noted before logging out, the following:(Unmodified but for one dash)
The third leg if not noted here is Economics and the Point is Justice or the fulcrum the Law. Values and their management is the key. Balancing the tetrahedron of flip-flop so to speak. The hour glass of consumption or conservation. Economics Politics Religion Law for the People - Executive, Legislative, Judiciary for the people and the point of balance.
I had my own preemptive concerns which need to be upgraded [3-6-09]and revisited, but how does this connect to the above?(a pun on hierarchy?) Facing choices and nemeses, not to mention the connection to things being in their place, whether fields or technologies and who uses what or whom and for what. Further search may dig up a reference to direct cause ofor[***] systems.
But prepost I read: Staving Off a Great Depression by Dean Baker The Guardian UK and where does this fit? In the fear or faith options; or fight or flight, excuse or blame sections. But I propose that the numbers game be given international scope[Update **].
[UPDATE 3-20-09: The following section remains in its original form but for bold. See BINGO which follows to where it relates to the nature of preemption.]
The honesty of the new budget and accounting now includes the war on terror which was not on the books. So rather than the declare a win or lose the economy bifurcation, the new accounting must include the soft power ingredients that do not come free. I have not seen where this is said, but it should and probably has been or will be.
[BINGO! or rather none other than Warren Buffet gets it.]
*i.e. by friendly nemesies however undivinely.
** Update International Scope and a new link at revisited: "Panarin insisted he didn't wish for a U.S. collapse, but he predicted Russia and China would emerge from the economic turmoil stronger and said the two nations should work together, even to create a new currency to replace the U.S. dollar." This guy may be the Rush of Russia but he could be on the same page as Putin, while I feel that economics may be the bailiwick of the Rumpole. "She who must be obeyed" and changed.
*** ofor: metaphysical synergistic concatenation
Shuster gives as good as he takes, but the irony is that Fleischer is there arguing over the childishness of Obama when Rush is not elected by the people, and neither is he. So the Catch 44 is that if Obama is wrong for painting the Republicans with a Rush Brush, then MSNBC is wrong for presenting unelected spokespeople for the Republicans, however it is the nature of the media to try to present both sides, and the nature of the Republicans to use Joe the Plumbers.
Speaking of plumbers and whose job it is...
Several links having filtered through my email box unprofessionally*
bridge the spectrum and filling the bill.
I will not unembed the threads but leap to the next field so to speak.
A more selective approach browsing the TED forum, a spin on the technology of politics and religion by Noah Feldman presents a preemptive perspective on hope. Having viewed less than two minutes, I noted before logging out, the following:(Unmodified but for one dash)
The third leg if not noted here is Economics and the Point is Justice or the fulcrum the Law. Values and their management is the key. Balancing the tetrahedron of flip-flop so to speak. The hour glass of consumption or conservation. Economics Politics Religion Law for the People - Executive, Legislative, Judiciary for the people and the point of balance.
I had my own preemptive concerns which need to be upgraded [3-6-09]and revisited, but how does this connect to the above?(a pun on hierarchy?) Facing choices and nemeses, not to mention the connection to things being in their place, whether fields or technologies and who uses what or whom and for what. Further search may dig up a reference to direct cause ofor[***] systems.
But prepost I read: Staving Off a Great Depression by Dean Baker The Guardian UK and where does this fit? In the fear or faith options; or fight or flight, excuse or blame sections. But I propose that the numbers game be given international scope[Update **].
[UPDATE 3-20-09: The following section remains in its original form but for bold. See BINGO which follows to where it relates to the nature of preemption.]
The honesty of the new budget and accounting now includes the war on terror which was not on the books. So rather than the declare a win or lose the economy bifurcation, the new accounting must include the soft power ingredients that do not come free. I have not seen where this is said, but it should and probably has been or will be.
[BINGO! or rather none other than Warren Buffet gets it.]
*i.e. by friendly nemesies however undivinely.
** Update International Scope and a new link at revisited: "Panarin insisted he didn't wish for a U.S. collapse, but he predicted Russia and China would emerge from the economic turmoil stronger and said the two nations should work together, even to create a new currency to replace the U.S. dollar." This guy may be the Rush of Russia but he could be on the same page as Putin, while I feel that economics may be the bailiwick of the Rumpole. "She who must be obeyed" and changed.
*** ofor: metaphysical synergistic concatenation
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)